On July 14, 2014 the EEOC issued its updated “Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Issues” (“Guidance”). The stated purpose of the Guidance is to provide information regarding the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) as they apply to pregnant employees. In addition to the new Guidance, the EEOC
Beth V. West
Beth is a Shareholder and Chair of the Firm’s Labor and Employment Group. She is admitted to practice law in California and Washington. She has years of experience assisting employers in all aspects of their employment relationship with their employees. Her practice focuses on counseling and training employers, HR professionals, and managers.
Remember Minimum Wage Increases on July 1, 2014 And So Does Your Weekly Salary Obligation for White Collar Exempt Employees
On July 1, 2014, California’s minimum hourly wage will increase from $8.00 to $9.00 per hour. The minimum wage will increase again on January 1, 2016 to $10.00 per hour. Most employers are aware of the increase and are prepared to comply by paying their minimum wage workers $9.00 per hour starting July 1, 2014. …
So You Think Your Employees Aren’t Protected Whistleblowers Under The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Because You’re Not A Publicly-Traded Company? Think Again!
Section 1514A of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act states that:
“No [public] company . . . , or any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such company, may discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment because of [whistleblowing or other protected activity].”…
FMLA Win for Employers – Employees Can Affirmatively Decline FMLA Leave & Thus FMLA Protections
On February 25, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc., holding that employees who affirmatively decline to take FMLA leave do not have the protections of FMLA. Maria Escriba worked in a Foster Poultry Farms, Inc. (Foster Farms) processing plant in Turlock, California for 18…
LAW ALERT – Employers Beware: Your FMLA Paperwork May Grant an Employee Protected Leave When They May Not Be Entitled to It
Can an employee take FMLA leave for substance abuse?
The FMLA regulations clearly state that:
“FMLA leave may only be taken for treatment for substance abuse by a health care provider or by a provider of health care services on referral by a health care provider. On the other hand, absence because of the employee’s use of the substance, rather than for treatment, does not qualify for FMLA leave.”
(19 C.F.R. § 825.119(a) (emphasis added).)
So, according to the regulations, an employee is not qualified for FMLA leave if he/she is absent because of current substance abuse right? Not so fast.
In Picarazzi v. John Crane, Inc. (“J. Crane”), the employee, Picarazzi, had a history of alcohol abuse and started to have attendance problems in March 2008. In late March or early April, 2008, the employee informed J. Crane of his alcoholism and his need to get some help. He filled out leave of absence paperwork and went into rehab on April 2, 2008. He turned in a FMLA medical certification from his doctor that said he would be in rehab for approximately 30 days and the anticipated discharge date was May 2, 2008. The HR coordinator for the J. Crane approved the FMLA leave and provided the employee with an FMLA designation form stating that his “12 weeks of job protection expires on June 23, 2008.” The Company also asked that the employee check in every 30 days. Continue Reading LAW ALERT – Employers Beware: Your FMLA Paperwork May Grant an Employee Protected Leave When They May Not Be Entitled to It