According to recent media reports, California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman released employment records to refute allegations that she knowingly hired an illegal immigrant as a nanny and housekeeper in 2000. These documents, which The Sacramento Bee posted at http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/Diaz%20Forms.pdf, provide a good illustration as to why California employers should use caution before adopting employment applications, forms, or policies of other employers. Regardless of their source, using such materials without first consulting a lawyer may lead to problems.
Continue Reading Meg Whitman’s “Nannygate” Records are a Good Reminder that Employers Should Consult Legal Counsel Regarding Employment Applications, Forms, and Policies
Labor Law
LAW ALERT: Department Of Labor Issues Model Notices For The Extended COBRA Subsidy
On January 19, 2010, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued model notices to help plan administrators and employers comply with COBRA notice requirements as dictated by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”), as amended by the Department of Defense Appropriation Act, 2010 (“2010 DOD Act”).
Continue Reading LAW ALERT: Department Of Labor Issues Model Notices For The Extended COBRA Subsidy
LAW ALERT: COBRA Subsidy Is Extended By President Obama
President Obama signed the “Fiscal Year 2010 Defense Appropriations Act” (“DAA”) on December 21, 2009. The DAA provides two important changes to the COBRA subsidy that was established under the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009” (“ARRA”) earlier this year.
Continue Reading LAW ALERT: COBRA Subsidy Is Extended By President Obama
LAW ALERT: The COBRA Subsidy Will End November 30, 2009 For Some Beneficiaries
The sixty-five percent (65%) COBRA premium subsidy provided for in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) will come to an end on November 30, 2009 for some qualified beneficiaries.
Continue Reading LAW ALERT: The COBRA Subsidy Will End November 30, 2009 For Some Beneficiaries
AN EMPLOYEE’S “ME TOO” EVIDENCE CAN PROVE DISCRIMINATION
In Johnson v. United Cerebral Palsy/Spastic Children’s Foundation of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, a California Court of Appeal has held that an employee can prove a case of discrimination by putting on evidence from other employees that claim that they too were subject to discrimination by the employer (“me too” evidence).
Continue Reading AN EMPLOYEE’S “ME TOO” EVIDENCE CAN PROVE DISCRIMINATION