Readers of this blog know that we frequently discuss the doctrine of preemption under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Information Act. That is, a claim for trade secret misappropriation will preempt any other common law claims based on the “same nucleus of facts.” However, a recent decision in Jobscience, Inc. v CVPartners, Inc., N.D.
preemption
Trade Secret Preemption Revisited
This blog has periodically visited the issue of preemption in trade secret cases. Preemption arises when a plaintiff alleges common law causes of action (such as conversion or interference with economic relations) with a trade secret misappropriation claim that is based on the “same nucleus of facts.” California courts have repeatedly held that California’s Uniform…
Pleading Around CUTSA Preemption
Readers of this blog will note our frequent reminders that preemption under California’s Uniform Trade Secret Act (“CUTSA”) can threaten other common law claims if not properly pled. A recent decision out of the Eastern District of California in Hat World, Inc. v. Kelly, 2012 U.S. Dist. Lexis 113060 (Aug. 10, 2012) reinforces this position.
…
California Uniform Trade Secrets Act Preemption: Golden Bullet or Much Ado About Nothing
It is common for plaintiffs in employee-related trade secrets and unfair competition cases to allege something of a grab bag of statutory and common law theories. Often, claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with economic advantage, breach of duty, and common law unfair competition will be based on the same set of facts…